Evaluating Disruptions

In some cases, it is difficult to fully grasp the scope of a task in advance; the dimensions of the venture become clear only through action. This applies to various aspects of life, such as significant biographical turning points, the commencement of a Ph.D., parenthood, transitioning to new professional positions, relocating, or embarking on new research projects. The outcome is not clear yet; it is not foreseeable whether one can be successful. This can be intimidating but also stimulating.
Individual success or failure represents just one of many criteria for the outcome. Some of these bold endeavors require embracing risk, even in the face of the possibility of failure. The consequences of these decisions do not immediately manifest following the event, even if the initial responses are troubling and sometimes disconcerting effects. Individual risks can break free from path dependencies and reduce feedback effects, making it easier to undergo new trials the next time, opening up possibilities in the future and providing learning opportunities. Only when we are able to assess how disruptions have opened up room for action and decision-making and how they have influenced change in the long term can we try to evaluate them.

Clara Jacobi, Scientific Coordinator of TUDiSC